340B Drug Discount Program

STOP THE SPECIAL INTEREST FEEDING FRENZY!
Patients are being fed to the sharks. Special interests, like contract pharmacies and hospitals, are taking advantage of unclear definitions of what constitutes a 340B patient to line their own pockets with discounts meant for those in need. The 340B program must strongly define patient eligibility and enforce strict accountability measures to enhance transparency.
The federal 340B drug discount program was created in 1992 to help federally funded clinics and public hospitals that serve a large uninsured population cover the cost of drugs and provide discounts to patients. However, the lack of clear intent and definition of a patient, along with poor oversight, have led to the program being exploited by hospitals and contract pharmacies to generate millions of dollars in profit. Patients are not getting their benefits, and taxpayers and consumers are paying the price for the abuses of the program. Reforms to 340B are essential and should be done by Congress rather than the states.
Let's get back to the way Congress intended the 340B program to be—for patients, not profits.
Prioritize patient needs.
- Establishing a centralized clearinghouse to manage and process 340B claims will facilitate better communication between pharmacies, healthcare providers, insurers, and patients. To monitor compliance and prevent issues, such as duplicate discounts and diversion, covered entities must provide continuous, real-time data.
Enhance accountability and transparency.
- To prevent program abuse, covered entities and contract pharmacies should verify patient eligibility every time medications are dispensed.
- Prescriptions must be linked to healthcare services provided within the past 12 months to ensure that the benefits reach the intended patient.
Define who qualifies for the program.
- The program must ensure that only those requiring financial assistance or with low-income benefit from it.
- Patients must be under the care of a physician affiliated with a qualifying 340B entity and receive a 340B prescription for a diagnosis related to their care.
It's time to fix this mess and fix 340B.

The Latest from 340B
CCAGW Urges Minnesota Legislators to Remove 340B Mandate from S.F. 4942
SF 4942's manufacturer mandate would change how the federal 340B drug pricing program operates in Minnesota.
CCAGW Urges Kansas Senate Ways and Means Committee to Accept the 340B Amendment
The Kansas House Appropriations Committee’s amendment to Substitute for SB514 eliminates proposed changes to the federal 340B drug pricing program.
CCAGW Urges Kansas Legislators to Oppose Amendment to SB 514
The move to amend Substitute for SB 514 will change how the federal 340B drug pricing program operates in the Sunflower State.
CCAGW Urges Governor Reeves to Veto House Bill 728
HB 728 would change how the federal 340B program operates in Mississippi.
The 340B Drug Pricing Program Needs a New Prescription
Federal healthcare programs are often well-intended but end up costing more than expected and become subject to waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement.
CCAGW Urges Oklahoma Representatives to Oppose HB 3379
HB 3379 would make changes to the federal 340B program.
CCAGW Urges Oklahoma Senators to Oppose SB 1628
SB 1628 would change how the federal 340B program operates in Oklahoma.
CCAGW Urges Governor Youngkin to Veto Senate Bill 119
SB 119 would change how the federal 340B program operates in the Old Dominion.
CCAGW Urges Nebraska Legislators to Oppose LB 984
LB 984 would change how the federal 340B program operates in the Cornhusker State.
CCAGW Urges Virginia Legislators to Oppose Senate Bill 119
SB 119 would make changes to the federal 340B drug discount program.
CCAGW Urges Mississippi Legislators to Oppose House Bill 728
HB 728 would make changes to the federal 340B drug discount program operates in the Magnolia State.
CCAGW Urges Oklahoma Senators to Oppose SB 1628
SB 1628 would change how the federal 340B Drug Discount Program operates in Oklahoma.











