Coalition Letter: Support the Sugar Policy Modernization Act of 2017

June 12, 2018

Dear Senator,

On behalf of the undersigned organizations and our millions of members across the country, we urge you to support S. 2086, the Sugar Policy Modernization Act of 2017, and the form it may take as a floor amendment to the 2018 Farm Bill.  This legislation is crucial for achieving necessary and substantive reform of the sugar program.

The U.S. sugar program, enacted in 1934, is an outdated, Soviet-style command-and-control scheme that uses import quotas, loans, marketing allotments, price supports, and tariffs to artificially inflate the price of sugar.  The federal government establishes a minimum price for sugar in the U.S., which averages roughly double the world price.  The government also imposes marketing controls, limiting how much sugar processors are allowed to sell.  These allotments are enforced and administered by a small cartel of sugar processors.

The sugar program is a hidden expense that costs small businesses and consumers $2.4 – $4 billion each year, according to the American Enterprise Institute.  Furthermore, according to the Census Bureau, the program killed about 123,000 jobs between 1997 and 2015.  And the Department of Commerce estimated that for every sugar-producing job protected through high U.S. sugar prices, about three manufacturing jobs are lost.

The Sugar Modernization Act of 2017 will create an adequate supply of sugar based on fairness and competitiveness for everyone in the supply chain from the farm to the retail shelf.  The bill will not hurt sugar farmers.  It will reform the burdensome, restrictive regulations on sugar imports and eliminate market allotments, both of which have hampered domestic production, stifled international trade, and benefited a few wealthy sugar processors.  This legislation also ensures there will be no costs to taxpayers by eliminating a subsidy that requires the federal government to sell sugar at a net loss to ethanol companies after sugar prices fall below guaranteed levels.

S. 2086 provides the necessary, market-oriented changes that will bring American sugar policy into the twenty-first century.  We urge you to support this legislation, because reforming the sugar program will benefit consumers, food manufacturers, taxpayers, and the economy.

Sincerely,

Tom Schatz
President, Council for Citizens Against Government Waste

Adam Brandon
President, FreedomWorks

Grover Norquist
President, Americans for Tax Reform

Pete Sepp
President, National Taxpayers Union

Heather R. Higgins
President and CEO, Independent Women's Voice

Eli Lehrer
President, R Street Institute

Phil Kerpen
President, American Commitment

Jeffrey Mazzella
President, Center for Individual Freedom

David Williams
President, Taxpayers Protection Alliance

Iain Murray
Vice President for Strategy, Competitive Enterprise Institute

Dee Stewart
President, Center for Innovation and Free Enterprise

David McIntosh
President, Club for Growth

Olivia Grady
Senior Fellow, Center for Worker Freedom

Brent Wm. Gardner
Chief Government Affairs Officer, Americans for Prosperity

Ryan Alexander
President, Taxpayers for Common Sense

Jonathan Bydlak
President, Coalition to Reduce Spending

Sara Croom
Executive Director, Trade Alliance to Promote Prosperity

Tim Chapman
Executive Director, Heritage Action

Andrew F. Quinlan
President, Center for Freedom and Prosperity

Lisa B. Nelson
CEO, ALEC Action

Jim Schaffer
Executive Director, Public Policy Foundation of West Virginia

Paul J. Gessing
President, Rio Grande Foundation

Matt Kibbe
President & CCO, Free the People

Karen Kerrigan
President & CEO, Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council

Yaël Ossowski
Deputy Director, Consumer Choice Center

Click for PDF

Issues Topics: 
Coalition/CAGW: 
Coalition Letters

Tired of the Government wasting your Tax Dollars? Take Action Here! (800) BE-ANGRY

CAGW Names Sen. Kamala Harris August 2018 Porker of the Month

Sen. Harris is CAGW's Porker of the Month for for proposing an expensive and impractical taxpayer-funded rent subsidy.